[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
- To: <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
- From: "Richard M. Hartman" <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Wed, 19 Jun 2002 01:16:17 -0700
- References: <3D08DB2A.17506.4C73D0E@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Does it exist _in_ the CRT or outside? I.E. mail-order businesses have an
outside-the-tube existence.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
----- Original Message -----
From: <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 5:49 PM
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
> Yes but there is still 200mile border...what borders are there WRT to the
> Internet since it transmits information. What borders does it have?
>
> On 13 Jun 2002 at 14:36, Richard Hartman wrote:
>
> From: Richard Hartman <[email protected]>
> To: "'[email protected]'" <dvd-
> [email protected]>
> Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
> Date sent: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:36:51 -0700
> Send reply to: [email protected]
>
> > I think the high seas (aka "international waters") would be a good
model.
> >
> > --
> > -Richard M. Hartman
> > [email protected]
> >
> > 186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Jim Bauer [mailto:[email protected]]
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:42 AM
> > > To: [email protected]
> > > Subject: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > We all know how stupid some of the recent cases have been WRT
> > > jurisdiction over the Internet. If the pattern holds, everyone will
> > > always be subject to the jurisdiction of every last place on earth at
> > > the same time.
> > >
> > > Has anyone pursued the idea of the Internet being "independent"?
> > > Either as its own country (assuming one can have a country without
> > > land), or perhaps more like how Antarctica is handled.
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Jim Bauer, [email protected]
> > >
>
>