[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 17:49:30 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Yes but there is still 200mile border...what borders are there WRT to the
Internet since it transmits information. What borders does it have?
On 13 Jun 2002 at 14:36, Richard Hartman wrote:
From: Richard Hartman <[email protected]>
To: "'[email protected]'" <dvd-
[email protected]>
Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
Date sent: Thu, 13 Jun 2002 14:36:51 -0700
Send reply to: [email protected]
> I think the high seas (aka "international waters") would be a good model.
>
> --
> -Richard M. Hartman
> [email protected]
>
> 186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jim Bauer [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 9:42 AM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: [dvd-discuss] Internet: an independent country?
> >
> >
> >
> > We all know how stupid some of the recent cases have been WRT
> > jurisdiction over the Internet. If the pattern holds, everyone will
> > always be subject to the jurisdiction of every last place on earth at
> > the same time.
> >
> > Has anyone pursued the idea of the Internet being "independent"?
> > Either as its own country (assuming one can have a country without
> > land), or perhaps more like how Antarctica is handled.
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jim Bauer, [email protected]
> >