[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF: Security Researchers Drop Scientific Censorship Case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF: Security Researchers Drop Scientific Censorship Case
- From: "Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold(at)world.std.com>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:32:27 -0500
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]><[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
At 5:33 PM +0100 2/7/02, Tom wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 08:30:01AM -0800, James S. Tyre wrote:
>> In the circumstances, this result cannot be unfair to Mr. Lodi.
>> Although it is true that, as plaintiff and appellant, he loses, it
>> is equally true that, as defendant and respondent, he wins. It is
>> hard to imagine a more even handed application of justice. Truly, it
>> would appear that Oreste Lodi is that rare litigant who is assured of
>> both victory and defeat regardless of which side triumphs.
>>
>
> > Lodi v. Lodi, 173 Cal.App.3d 628 (1985)
>
>what was that case about? just curious, sounds like an interesting
>story.
>
The decision is at http://members.aol.com/schwenkler/wcc/lodi.htm
Arnold Reinhold