[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF: Security Researchers Drop Scientific Censo rship Case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] EFF: Security Researchers Drop Scientific Censo rship Case
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Thu, 7 Feb 2002 17:33:41 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 08:30:01AM -0800
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Thu, Feb 07, 2002 at 08:30:01AM -0800, James S. Tyre wrote:
> In the circumstances, this result cannot be unfair to Mr. Lodi.
> Although it is true that, as plaintiff and appellant, he loses, it
> is equally true that, as defendant and respondent, he wins. It is
> hard to imagine a more even handed application of justice. Truly, it
> would appear that Oreste Lodi is that rare litigant who is assured of
> both victory and defeat regardless of which side triumphs.
>
> Lodi v. Lodi, 173 Cal.App.3d 628 (1985)
what was that case about? just curious, sounds like an interesting
story.
--
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/D88D35A6 2001-11-14 Tom Vogt <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = 276B B7BB E4D8 FCCE DB8F F965 310B 811A D88D 35A6