[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Another opinion on the appellate court's decision (longish)
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Another opinion on the appellate court's decision (longish)
- From: Jeremy Simmons <jsimmons(at)langc.tohoku.ac.jp>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 09:01:28 +0900
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
2001 11�� 30 ������ 23:25�����ʤ��Ͻޤ���:
> On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:20:57PM +0900, Jeremy Simmons wrote:
> > Or perhaps put a link to a plug-in that
> > automatically made URL's links on the web page by the user's browser even
> > though it is not on the originating server.
>
> Like this?
>
> http://sites.inka.de/risctaker/cgi-bin/LinksProxy.pl.cgi?http://www.2600.co
>m/news/1999/1227-help.html
This is certainly effective but not exactly what I had in mind because if
this site is in America (presumably its in Germany) it could be added to the
injunction.
On an old Mac I had, it was possible to add an extension to Eudora so that a
shift click on a URL in an e-mail would automatically open a browser. If the
link only appeared in the browser and never anywhere else and everyone had
such a browser the logic of the decision is even easier too undermind.
Simmons