[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Another opinion on the appellate court's decision (longish)
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Another opinion on the appellate court's decision (longish)
- From: Sham Gardner <mail(at)risctaker.inka.de>
- Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2001 15:25:53 +0100
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:20:57PM +0900
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.0i
On Fri, Nov 30, 2001 at 11:20:57PM +0900, Jeremy Simmons wrote:
> Or perhaps put a link to a plug-in that
> automatically made URL's links on the web page by the user's browser even
> though it is not on the originating server.
Like this?
http://sites.inka.de/risctaker/cgi-bin/LinksProxy.pl.cgi?http://www.2600.com/news/1999/1227-help.html
--
http://sites.inka.de/risctaker/DeCSS/
"DVDCCA's statutory right to protect its economically valuable trade secret
is not an interest that is 'more fundamental' than the First Amendment right
to freedom of speech [...] Accordingly, we are compelled to reverse the
preliminary injunction." (California Appeals Court)