[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Re: [dvd-discuss] winnie the pooh lawsuit against Disney dismissed
- To: Openlaw DMCA Forum <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: Re: [dvd-discuss] winnie the pooh lawsuit against Disney dismissed
- From: Jeme A Brelin <jeme(at)brelin.net>
- Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:46:16 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
On Tue, 30 Mar 2004 [email protected] wrote:
> Salon recently published a short little essay on Disney's Great
> Illustrated Classics Series, which apparently is supplanting the
> original versions of "Black Beauty", "Wind in the Willows", and other
> works of Children's literature, with bowdlerized, abridged versions.
>
> http://www.salon.com/books/feature/2004/03/29/willows/index.html
It's a good article on the dumbing down of culture...
but Great Illustrated Classics are not a Disney product, from what I can
tell... they're from Baronet Books. I can't find anything about who owns
that.
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
[email protected]
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org