[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Diebold uses DMCA to suppress embarrassing memos
- To: Openlaw DMCA Forum <dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Diebold uses DMCA to suppress embarrassing memos
- From: Jeme A Brelin <jeme(at)brelin.net>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2003 09:30:57 -0800 (PST)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
On Mon, 3 Nov 2003, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > From: Jeme A Brelin [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Nobody has yet found a way to make vibrating air molecules into a
> > fixed medium... you gotta go ahead and store the vibration patterns
> > somehow and revibrate later.
>
> It's called an "audio tape"
Maybe if you stopped evolving in 1984, it is.
I like minidisc, myself. Some people like hard disk recorders or those
little on-chip memory recorders.
(Yet, most people still call recording "taping" even though recording
audio existed before tape. I guess that's a boomer effect. We do still
talk about "dialling" telephones, though dials are long gone.)
> For a non-taped conversation we're down to someone relaying what they
> remember ... this is known as "hearsay".
It's only hearsay if the relaying party was not directly involved in the
conversation.
Generally, it's called "recall".
J.
--
-----------------
Jeme A Brelin
[email protected]
-----------------
[cc] counter-copyright
http://www.openlaw.org