[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] did everyone already see this?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] did everyone already see this?
- From: Ernest Miller <ernest.miller(at)aya.yale.edu>
- Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2003 09:32:53 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.4) Gecko/20030624
The copyrighted content in this case was the code the operated the
garage door opener. I've been engaged in some debate on the issue here:
http://research.yale.edu/lawmeme/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=1187
Richard Hartman wrote:
>btw: to qualify for DMCA the TPM must be protecting some copyrightable content. AFAICT the garage doors were protecting cars, not content. Why wasn't the claim dismissed as inapplicable?
>
>
>
>