[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Sen. Hatch supports remote destruction
- From: Phil Gengler <phil(at)codeallday.com>
- Date: 17 Jun 2003 20:08:03 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
Violating the DMCA implies you're violating copyright laws, but
violating copyright laws doesn't mean you're violating the DMCA.
On Tue, 2003-06-17 at 20:04, Richard Hartman wrote:
> Violating copyright laws and violating the DMCA are _not_ the same thing.
>
> Vigilante actions are typically against the law -- law enforcement is in the hands of the police agencies, not the individual (or the corporations).