[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Illegal tactics funded by Anti-piracy advocates
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Illegal tactics funded by Anti-piracy advocates
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dvd(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 19:52:09 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- Organization: There is no Lumber Cartel!
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: KMail/1.4.3
On Wednesday 07 May 2003 14:08, Jeremy Erwin wrote:
# A bit far fetched-- don't you think? Many of these viruses target file
# sharing networks. It would probably be a violation of the various
# privacy act statutes to install the necessary clients. It all seems a
# little bizarre to me-- as I'm not aware of any mp3 players that are
# designed to execute arbitrary code.
A file is a file. Since not all systems are as wide-open to
attack as MSWindows (and by the way, doesn't this plan
suggest that the Cartel knows that they can count on that
insecurity?) someone could download it on a robust
system and then pass it -- more-or-less innocently -- to
someone else via e-mail or whatever.
--
begin signature.exe
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?