[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Illegal tactics funded by Anti-piracy advocates
- To: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Illegal tactics funded by Anti-piracy advocates
- From: "Arnold G. Reinhold" <reinhold(at)world.std.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2003 09:09:51 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <3EB7F12C.29244.86F3D@localhost><[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)eon.law.harvard.edu
At 4:24 AM -0700 5/7/03, Glendon M. Gross wrote:
>...
>
>Particularly interesting to me was the idea that the record companies
>are supporting software that sabatoges the internet connections of those
>who
>choose to download software from peer-to-peer networks. I wonder if
>this will eventually lead to a test case in which a music label is sued
>for supporting software that results in costly corporate downtime. I
>once supported a client who told me that one minute of downtime would
>cost his firm $500,000,000. At that rate, causing downtime could be
>very expensive for the record companies who support software that can be
>proven to have caused some downtime.
>
It's entirely conceivable that record company sabotage could kill
someone. Say a nurse downloads music on a computer used to monitor
hospital patients, it freezes, and they miss a cardiac arrest. The
people responsible for that sabotage software could be subject to the
death penalty under the the federal anti-hacking laws as recently
amended by the USA Patriot Act.
Arnold Reinhold