[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] SCC, Lexmark, and copyright versusreverse-engineering
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] SCC, Lexmark, and copyright versusreverse-engineering
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dvd(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Apr 2003 06:56:39 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <3E85B544.14740.28CEBA@localhost> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: KMail/1.5.1
On Tuesday 01 April 2003 23:14, Stephen L Johnson wrote:
# On Tue, 2003-04-01 at 20:11, D. C. Sessions wrote:
# > # > begin signature.exe
# > # > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
# > # > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
# > # > A: Top-posting.
# > # > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?
#
# I love your .sig. :)
Not original with me, but the permission to reuse is,
like the GPL, transitive.
--
begin signature.exe
A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet?