[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] OT: request for references
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] OT: request for references
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 09:56:10 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Here's Pamela Samuelson's website
http://www.sims.berkeley.edu/~pam/
http://www.press.umich.edu/jep/04-03/samuelson.html
A few references to the procd case
http://laws.lp.findlaw.com/7th/961139.html
http://www.law.seattleu.edu/fachome/chonm/Cases/procd1.html
http://www.law.seattleu.edu/fachome/chonm/Cases/procd2.html
On another list I am having a discussion with someone
who talks about "software consumer contracts" (by which
I believe they are referring to shrinkwrap and clickwrap).
I know discussions here in the past have pointed out the
legal flaws in considering these to be contracts. One of
which has to do with -- IIRC -- there is no negotiation
between the parties. Another has to do with "first sale"
superceeding the so-called license agreements printed
on the box.
Can anybody point me to either actual case law
or legal statute that shows where "software consumer
contracts" do not actually exist?
--
-Richard M. Hartman
[email protected]
186,000 mi/sec: not just a good idea, it's the LAW!