[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] DMCA exemption reply comments now available
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] DMCA exemption reply comments now available
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Sat, 01 Mar 2003 08:06:17 -0800
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <3E5FBF3B.4438.695015@localhost>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Post it to slash dot
On 28 Feb 2003 at 21:59, Ken Arromdee wrote:
Date sent: Fri, 28 Feb 2003 21:59:28 -0800 (PST)
From: Ken Arromdee <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] DMCA exemption reply comments now available
Send reply to: [email protected]
> Two things that struck me were:
> -- how few private individuals got a comment in (aside from the EFF's form
> comment). Come on people, if you have the time to post on Slashdot, you have
> the time for a comment. -- how biased the procedure is by giving the replies the
> last word. The companies get to make lots of false or misleading statements,
> and nobody can rebut them. (Like Sony's about modchips--if that was in a first
> round comment I'd have pointed out that for the Saturn, where modding for region
> was easier than modding for piracy, the majority of the mods were for region.)
>
> I wonder if even the censorware exemption is going to go through this time.
>