[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Distribution (Was: Eldred Being Argued Today)
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Distribution (Was: Eldred Being Argued Today)
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Thu, 10 Oct 2002 11:12:34 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:35:39PM -0700
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, Oct 09, 2002 at 09:35:39PM -0700, D. C. Sessions wrote:
> One of the arguments that the Cartel advanced today (IIRC and
> IIUC) was that without exclusive distribution rights, nobody
> would distribute the old material at all.
Uh, am I just being dense or is that the most stupid argument they can
make given the fact that the very case is about someone wanting
to do exactly that?
--
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5