[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] CA Supreme Court hears Pavlovich Jurisdiction Challenge in DVDCCA case
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] CA Supreme Court hears Pavlovich Jurisdiction Challenge in DVDCCA case
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 17:39:14 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:32:06AM -0400
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Mon, Sep 09, 2002 at 11:32:06AM -0400, Ole Craig wrote:
> Moreover, they don't have to sue the manufacturer -- all they
> have to do is invoke 1701's "trafficking" clause to nail any would-be
> importers.
Let me get this straight: The MPAA is going to sue, say, WalMart over
selling ("trafficking") cheap DVD players?
--
PGP/GPG key: http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5