[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] CA Supreme Court hears Pavlovich JurisdictionChallenge in DVDCCA case
- To: DVD-Discuss <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] CA Supreme Court hears Pavlovich JurisdictionChallenge in DVDCCA case
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dcs(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: 06 Sep 2002 23:16:33 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]><[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Bringing the matter back to personal jurisdiction, I'm trying to
understand:
1) If the existence of a film industry is sufficient to establish
personal jurisdiction, does this mean that Pavlovich will next
be sued in New York, Florida, etc?
2) If not, why not? Is California the *only* State which can
exercise personal jurisdiction over movie industry issues?
--
| The race is not always to the swift, nor the battle to the strong. |
| Because the slow, feeble old codgers like me cheat. |
+--------------- D. C. Sessions <[email protected]> --------------+