[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Geeks in government: A good idea?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Geeks in government: A good idea?
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 13:36:21 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <3D5F9CA9.8157.54808DE@localhost>; from [email protected] on Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:10:01PM -0700
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On 18 Aug 2002 at 22:18, Tom wrote:
Date sent: Sun, 18 Aug 2002 22:18:04 +0200
From: Tom <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Geeks in government: A good idea?
Send reply to: [email protected]
> On Sun, Aug 18, 2002 at 01:10:01PM -0700, [email protected] wrote:
> > > > neither in California, but on the internet. If you have 15000 download
> > > > locations, what does the opinion of a NY court matter?
> >
> > Only if the civil disobedience is massive-not ones or twos or thousands but
> > millions-in the USA alone. Hundreds of millions worldwide.
>
> So? If the P2P networks aren't exactly that, what is?
The potential for that...the question as Declan points out is if the software
is available but more than that the knowledge. The suppression of P2P is less
important than the fact that the knowledge of P2P is being suppressed.
>
>
> --
> http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
> pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <[email protected]>
> Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5