[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Fox recommends multiregion (aka hacked) DVD players to UKc...
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Fox recommends multiregion (aka hacked) DVD players to UKc...
- From: "Robert S. Thau" <rst(at)ai.mit.edu>
- Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2002 14:09:57 -0400 (EDT)
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
Richard Hartman writes:
> So it would be possible to produce a DVD intended for
> region 1 -or- 2 play, but not for play in region 3?
Or a DVD which is playable everywhere *except* region 6 (China
--- excluding Hong Kong, which is region 3, in case anyone thinks this
isn't political).
And, let's recall, Time-Warner lawyer Dean Marks' revelatory testimony
at the Library of Congress DMCA hearings explicitly acknowledged that:
PAGE 262
1 MR. MARKS: Another reason why we need
2 regional coding, why we do regional coding is that
3 the law in various territories is different with
4 regard to censorship requirements. So we cannot
5 simply distribute the same work throughout the world
6 in the same version. Local laws impose censorship
7 regulations on us that require us to both exhibit
8 and distribute versions of the films that comply
9 with those censorship requirements.
... though strangely enough, China is the only case I can find where a
region's boundaries exactly coincide with a single political
jurisdiction...
rst