[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Comparing DeCSS with legitimate code.
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 21:29:18 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:53:46AM -0700
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, May 24, 2002 at 10:53:46AM -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
> I thought that CSS was the Content Scrambling System
> ... that is, that CSS was _only_ the encryption portion
> of the "three pronged approach".
I wouldn't think so, considering that the CSS license is about quite a
few things that have nothing whatsoever to do with technical or legal
details of encryption.
--
New GPG Key issued (old key expired):
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5