[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Patented copyright ...
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Patented copyright ...
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 17:56:33 +0200
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:44:46AM -0700
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Wed, May 22, 2002 at 08:44:46AM -0700, Richard Hartman wrote:
> Now I see a flaw here ... sure, they own the copyright
> on the genetic "music" ... and if I play it on the radio
> I'll owe them royalties ... but if I make a drug based
> on the DNA sequence that has nothing to do with the encoded
> music ... or that would be my take on this scheme.
they'd probably say you had to circumvent a protection system in order
to find the formula for your drug...
--
New GPG Key issued (old key expired):
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/2D7A04F5 2002-05-16 Tom Vogt <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = C731 64D1 4BCF 4C20 48A4 29B2 BF01 9FA1 2D7A 04F5