[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] ``irreparable damage to my client''
- From: Ron Gustavson <rongusss(at)attbi.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2002 13:19:48 -0400
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Fri, 26 Apr 2002 09:51:03 -0700, "Michael A Rolenz" wrote:
>if it is a license then who did she negociate it with?...If USENET, then
>usenet has a whole set of conditions (as another post pointed out) and
>republishing stuff is part of it.....If it's a implied non exclusive
>license then she can't later try to make it an exclusive one. ...
Another thought-- although we can't now check the removed post,
did she use the Distribution: and Expires: headers?
______________NO-∞-DO_____________
7607 6FA2 6485 3707 42D1 99AD 7E20 52FD