[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Jack now wants copy protected PCs
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Jack now wants copy protected PCs
- From: "Michael A Rolenz" <Michael.A.Rolenz(at)aero.org>
- Date: Tue, 26 Feb 2002 14:50:35 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
But does slashdot want to write commentary to the washington post ? Enough
well written commentary and maybe Bradley and Bernstein will stop raking
muck and start the Post doing some real reporting again.
Ronald Austin <[email protected]>
Sent by: [email protected]
02/26/02 11:43 AM
Please respond to dvd-discuss
To: <[email protected]>
cc:
Subject: [dvd-discuss] Jack now wants copy protected PCs
Saw this on Slashdot it's a good example of Jack's FUD
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A62085-2002Feb24.html
You can guess what the diss-cussin is like on Slashdot :-)
Ronald