[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] DC Coder Circumvention Device
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] DC Coder Circumvention Device
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2002 08:53:40 -0800
- Cc: dmca_discuss(at)lists.microshaft.org
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
I read an article on Wired News that mentioned that
the foriegn company had switched to a new shipper.
I wondered if that simple an approach would work.
Apparently it did.
--
-Richard M. Hartman
[email protected]
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Young [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2002 5:04 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: [dvd-discuss] DC Coder Circumvention Device
>
>
> In response to the Colin McMillen's messages Seth forwarded
> about US Customs prohibiting import of a DC-coder cable as
> a violation of DMCA, we ordered one and it arrived today via
> Global Express Mail, thus demonstrating a double standard
> depending on type of shipment used. Documentation on the
> order and photo of the circumvention device:
>
> http://cryptome.org/dc-coder.htm
>
>