[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for ReviewbySCOTUS
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Eldred v. Ashcroft Accepted for ReviewbySCOTUS
- From: "D. C. Sessions" <dvd(at)lumbercartel.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2002 23:38:23 -0700
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- Organization: ***** SPLORFFF!!! *****
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
On Wednesday 20 February 2002 15:47, you wrote:
# On Wed, 20 Feb 2002, John Zulauf wrote:
#
# >
# > The copyright clause is about promoting progress, not maximizing
# > return. Having a variable term for works copyrights will only lead to
#
# Isn't 'progress' usually considered fulfilled when you maximize the
# economic output from a work. When the most money is made on a work?
Made by whom?
There's more money being made today on Shakespeare than old
Bill ever dreamed of.
--
| I'm old enough that I don't have to pretend to be grown up.|
+----------- D. C. Sessions <[email protected]> ----------+