[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] An interesting case from 9th Circuit Appeals co urt
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] An interesting case from 9th Circuit Appeals co urt
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Feb 2002 22:20:59 +0100
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:02:31PM -0800
- References: <[email protected]>
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Feb 08, 2002 at 01:02:31PM -0800, Richard Hartman wrote:
> > I disagree that embedding is bad. If you don't want your
> > images imbedded, then don't serve them to any page except
> > your refering page.
>
> That is not in my power to accomplish. My site is hosted
> by a service and I do not have that level of control. (btw:
> how would you go about specifying that sort of restriction?)
all you need is some kind of scripting language, say perl or PHP, and a
region in your webspace that can be read by that program, but is not
public.
then you write a simple wrapper that sends out the image data when
called, after checking the referrer.
--
http://web.lemuria.org/pubkey.html
pub 1024D/D88D35A6 2001-11-14 Tom Vogt <[email protected]>
Key fingerprint = 276B B7BB E4D8 FCCE DB8F F965 310B 811A D88D 35A6