[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [dvd-discuss] Good AiboPet Hacker - DMCA story in Sci Am
- To: "'dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu'" <dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu>
- Subject: RE: [dvd-discuss] Good AiboPet Hacker - DMCA story in Sci Am
- From: Richard Hartman <hartman(at)onetouch.com>
- Date: Thu, 24 Jan 2002 09:22:48 -0800
- Reply-to: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Michael A Rolenz [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 8:56 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Good AiboPet Hacker - DMCA story in Sci Am
>
>
> "The DMCA remains the law of the land and what AiboPet does
> breaks it.
> Sony
> retains its right to crack down on AiboPet and others like him, but
> chooses not
> to exercise it, for now."
>
> OK.....how does the doctrine of estoppel apply here?
>
You take the estoppel out of the bottle and take a few
big swigs?
Perhaps you could give a brief description, for the
non-lawspeak-enabled what "the doctrine of estoppel"
is?
--
-Richard M. Hartman
[email protected]
186,000 mi./sec ... not just a good idea, it's the LAW!