[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Content neutral?
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Content neutral?
- From: microlenz(at)earthlink.net
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 14:01:47 -0800
- In-reply-to: <[email protected]>
- References: Your message of "Sat, 01 Dec 2001 09:53:49 MST." <[email protected]>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
The best quotation from Bartnicki v. Volper,
532 U.S. 514 is
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Content neutral?
Date sent: Sat, 01 Dec 2001 14:36:01 -0500
From: "Peter D. Junger" <[email protected]>
Send reply to: [email protected]
<snip>
> As a general rule, laws that by their
> terms distinguish favored speech from disfavored speech on the
> basis of the ideas or views expressed are content based.
<snip>
DeCSS expresses the ideas regarding DVD security. This speech,
disfavored by the MPAA and the subject of the DMCA is content
based.