[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Bush taps Clarke as CyberdefenseChief
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] Fwd: Bush taps Clarke as CyberdefenseChief
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2001 18:46:09 +0200
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:32:02AM -0400
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Fri, Oct 12, 2001 at 11:32:02AM -0400, Noah silva wrote:
> Clearly, people don't understand something here ;)
we do. the point was that there are two movements towards doom here:
a) M$'s ridiculous "security" concepts and even worse implementations
b) the outlawing of real crypto.
because while M$ will spin its Xor as "encryption" in marketing, it
will surely argue that "it's not *actually* encryption, is it?" when it
comes to deciding that question in court because of some moronic
"anti-terrorism" law. so we get encryption that is not really more
secure than plaintext while real encryption is illegal.
is having a clue a capital crime within 100 miles of washington dc?
--
-- http://web.lemuria.org
--