[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [dvd-discuss] ClearChannel Plays It Safe
- To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Subject: Re: [dvd-discuss] ClearChannel Plays It Safe
- From: Tom <tom(at)lemuria.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Sep 2001 07:17:37 +0200
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]>; from [email protected] on Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:56:28PM -0700
- References: <[email protected]> <[email protected]>
- Reply-To: dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- Sender: owner-dvd-discuss(at)cyber.law.harvard.edu
- User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 02:56:28PM -0700, Bryan Taylor wrote:
> But with responsibility does not come an obligation to use your resources to
> communicate messages you don't want to communicate. A private entitiy, such as
> a radio station has no legal or moral obligation to communicate a message to
> your liking. In fact, just the opposite, they have the right not to.
I disagree on this. this private entity is using public property for
its purpose (the airwaves). it would be only fair to demand a certain
amount of caring for the public interest in return. say, some amount of
broadcasting (1 hour? say 2 slots of 30 min between 8 am and 10 pm) every
day reserved for things people might want to say.
--
-- http://web.lemuria.org
--